#Vibe Coding Is the New No-Code, but It Can Wreck Your Focus

I need you to know this upfront: vibe coding is the fastest way I’ve ever turned an idea into a working screen. It’s also the easiest way I’ve ever lost an entire afternoon and end up with… nothing I’d actually share.

If you’ve been there—ten tabs open, three versions of the same feature, and a vague feeling that you’re “close”—this is for you.

ℹ️ Info When I say “vibe coding,” I mean prompt → run → react → steer → repeat.

Introduction

A while back, “no-code” meant you picked a template, dragged some blocks around, and accepted the limits. Annoying sometimes, sure—but the constraints were also a gift. They forced you to ship something.

Vibe coding flips that. You can ask for almost anything, instantly.

And that’s the whole problem: too many doors open at once.

I’m not here to be dramatic about it. I’m here because I want you to actually ship, and vibe coding can either help you do that—or quietly turn into a casino where you keep pulling the lever for “one more improvement.”

Vibe coding in plain English

Here’s a quick glossary so we’re speaking the same language:

Vibe coding : Building by describing what you want, letting AI generate the code, and judging it mainly by running it (not reading every line first).

Thin MVP : The smallest version that delivers one outcome for one user flow.

Progress theater : Work that looks impressive in motion but doesn’t move you closer to “someone can use this today.”

Guardrails : Rules you add on purpose so you don’t drift into unlimited features, refactors, and rewrites.

If you’re thinking, “Okay, but isn’t that just coding with AI?” Kind of. The difference is the center of gravity.

Traditional coding usually asks: “Is this written the right way?” Vibe coding tends to ask: “Does it work when I run it?”

That’s not wrong. It’s just incomplete—especially if you care about quality, maintainability, and your own sanity.

Why vibe coding wrecks your focus

Vibe coding creates a dangerously satisfying loop:

1. You ask for something.
2. You get something.
3. You see it on the screen.
4. Your brain goes, “Nice. Again.”

If you’re nodding right now, you already get it.

The trap isn’t the AI. The trap is the feeling of momentum. You can generate 10 “better” versions of a feature and still not have:

• a clear user
• a clear outcome
• a clear offer
• a build you trust enough to send to someone else

Here are the most common focus failures I see (and yes, I’ve done all of them):

⚠️ Warning If you don’t add constraints, vibe coding will happily consume every free hour you give it.

One more thing that doesn’t get said enough: when everything is easy, decision-making becomes the hard part. You’ll feel “blocked” even while you’re producing output.

That’s why I treat vibe coding like no-code: I make it smaller on purpose.

The no-code mindset that makes vibe coding work

No-code worked because it forced constraint. Vibe coding works when you recreate that constraint manually.

This is the system I fall back on when I feel myself drifting.

1) Write a one-sentence goal you can’t wiggle out of

Not a paragraph. Not a vision board.

One sentence.

Examples:

• “Help a local photographer collect booking requests in under 60 seconds.”
• “Let a coach sell one paid call with one checkout link.”
• “Turn a list of leads into follow-up emails with one button.”

Here’s the rule I use: If your next prompt doesn’t serve that sentence, it’s a distraction.

2) Define the thin MVP as one flow

If you’re building a booking page, the thin MVP is:

• a page
• a calendar input (even if it’s basic)
• a form submit
• a confirmation message

Not reminders, not rescheduling, not “admin dashboards.” You can earn those later.

3) Put guardrails inside the prompt itself

I keep a little “do not drift” paragraph that I paste into almost every request:

• “Keep it minimal.”
• “No extra features unless I ask.”
• “Avoid big refactors.”
• “Use simple, readable structure.”
• “Explain exactly where I change text, colors, and layout.”

That’s how you stay the boss. You’re not “asking for an app.” You’re commissioning a tiny, specific outcome.

4) Make trust part of the build

This is the part most people skip, and it’s why their demos never become products.

Trust is boring stuff like:

• does it load fast?
• does it work on mobile?
• are errors readable?
• does it fail gracefully?
• does it protect user data?

If you want one external checklist that’s worth bookmarking, it’s the OWASP Top 10—not because you’ll implement everything, but because it reminds you what “real-world” means.

My 90-minute vibe coding session workflow

If you want a workflow that actually ends in something shippable, this is mine. It’s simple on purpose.

Step 1: Lock the scope before you touch the keyboard

I open a blank note and write:

• Goal (one sentence)
• User (one type of person)
• Outcome (one action)
• Non-goals (the things I will not build today)

Then I start.

Step 2: Build the thin version end-to-end

I’m trying to get to “works once” as fast as possible. Not “perfect.” Not “scalable.” Not “beautiful.”

Just: the flow completes.

Step 3: Run the “stranger test”

This is where I talk to you directly:

If a stranger landed on your page right now… would they know what to do in five seconds?

If not, it’s not a feature problem. It’s a clarity problem.

Step 4: Use a short checklist before you call it “done”

Here’s what I check every single time:

• The main flow works from start to finish
• It works on mobile (not “kinda,” actually works)
• I can explain it in one sentence out loud
• The CTA is obvious and repeated (not hidden)
• Errors are friendly (no scary red stack traces)
• I wrote down the next smallest improvement

When I’m in an editor, I try not to break my concentration by clicking around. I use Cmd + K to jump to files/search and Cmd + Shift + P to run commands quickly.

✅ Success If I can produce a live link, a screenshot, or a 30-second demo, the session counts.

Optional: a tiny spec template that keeps you focused

If you’re prone to scope creep (hi, same), paste this into your prompt before you start.

Optional: a tiny spec template that keeps you focused

If you’re prone to scope creep (hi, same), paste this into your prompt before you start.

The prompt pack I reuse to avoid scope creep

These are the seven prompts I copy/paste when I feel myself drifting. I’m not claiming they’re magical. They just push me back into “ship mode.”

1. Plan first (don’t build yet)

   “Before you code, ask me 5 questions to clarify the goal, user, and the smallest shippable version.”

2. Minimal build

   “Build the smallest working version. No extras. One page, one flow.”

3. Explain the structure

   “Explain the structure like I’m new. Point out where I edit text, styles, and configuration.”

4. Add exactly one feature

   “Add only [FEATURE]. Don’t refactor everything. Keep changes small.”

5. Validation + manual test plan

   “Add basic validation and give me a manual test checklist I can run in 5 minutes.”

6. Performance pass

   “Reduce bloat. Remove unused code. Keep it fast and readable.”

7. Security sanity check

   “List the top security risks in this app and the simplest fixes I should apply first.”

How I know I’m about to spiral (click to expand)

If I catch myself doing any of these, I stop and rewrite my one-sentence goal:

• I’m prompting for new features before the original flow works reliably

• I’m “cleaning up” code I don’t fully understand yet

• I’m changing stacks mid-build because I got annoyed

• I’m optimizing for elegance instead of a user outcome

  The fastest way out is boring: finish the thin MVP, then decide what’s worth improving.

A practical vibe coding stack for small products

You don’t need a complicated stack to ship. You need a path from idea → link → feedback.

Here’s a practical setup that works for a lot of solo builders:

The mix I like best is this:

• no-code for the marketing site (clean, fast, polished)
• vibe coding for the “special sauce” feature (the thing that differentiates you)

And if you’re thinking, “But I’m not technical enough for this,” I’ll say what I wish someone had told me earlier:

You don’t need to be a perfect programmer to ship. You need to be a strong editor. That means you:

• define what “done” is
• test like a real user
• keep scope tight
• ship in small loops

If you want to keep reading in that direction, Explore more posts.

---

Thanks for reading! Contact me or explore more posts.

– Wired Living